Summary

Portrait of Noah Haynes Swayne Noah Haynes Swayne Robertson v. Carson — Opinion of the Court

The property was conveyed to McBurney and Gillespie, to be held by them for themselves and for such uses as they should appoint for the benefit of the other members of the firm. They paid Ball in Confederate money, and he paid his debt to the estate of Carson in the same medium. Robertson, one of the executors, thereupon gave up his bonds and released the mortgage. The legatees, William and James Carson, after reaching the age of majority, assigned all their rights under the will to the complainant, who is the widow of the testator.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Noah Haynes Swayne Noah Haynes Swayne Robertson v. Carson — Opinion of the Court

The legal title was vested by that instrument in him and McBurney, and there is no averment that they do not yet hold it. This renders Gillespie an indispensable party. [4]
It appears that Hyatt has released his interest to his copartners, but it also appears that they have given him a mortgage upon the premises to secure the payment of $40,000. If he shall not be made a party, and the complainant shall be successful, his rights will not be affected by the decree.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature