Summary

Portrait of Noah Haynes Swayne Noah Haynes Swayne McBurney v. Carson — Opinion of the Court

The question has been raised whether Robertson acted, touching the bonds and mortgage of Ball, as executor or trustee. The matter is immaterial in this case. An executor guilty of a devastavit, whereby assets are diverted from their proper application, and a trustee guilty of a breach of trust, and their accomplices, if they have any, are held liable upon the same principle and to the same extent.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Noah Haynes Swayne Noah Haynes Swayne McBurney v. Carson — Opinion of the Court

The last amended bill is silent as to the sale of the personal property, and the decree relates only to the bonds of Ball for the purchase-money of the plantation and the mortgage securing them upon that property. The decree charges upon the property the amount due on the bonds, and directs the mortgage to be enforced in all respects as if the bonds had not been surrendered and the mortgage had not been cancelled. McBurney and McGhan are the only appellants.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Noah Haynes Swayne Noah Haynes Swayne McBurney v. Carson — Opinion of the Court

As the sons of the testator came of age they transferred their entire interest in the estate of their father to their mother. She filed the bill to set aside the cancellation of the mortgage upon Dean Hall as fraudulent and void, and to charge Elias N. Ball and his surety with the amount due upon their bonds given for the personal property. The bill did not make any member of the firm of McBurney & Co. a party, except McBurney. Hyatt, it appeared, was a resident of New York, of which State the complainant was also a resident and citizen.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature