Summary

Portrait of Frank H. Easterbrook Frank H. Easterbrook ProCD v. Zeidenberg — Opinion of the Court

Consumer goods work the same way. Someone who wants to buy a radio set visits a store, pays, and walks out with a box. Inside the box is a leaflet containing some terms, the most important of which usually is the warranty, read for the first time in the comfort of home. By Zeidenberg's lights, the warranty in the box is irrelevant; every consumer gets the standard warranty implied by the UCC in the event the contract is silent; yet so far as we are aware no state disregards warranties furnished with consumer products.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Frank H. Easterbrook Frank H. Easterbrook ProCD v. Zeidenberg — Opinion of the Court

If because of high elasticity of demand in the consumer segment of the market the only way to make a profit turned out to be a price attractive to commercial users alone, then all consumers would lose out--and so would the commercial clients, who would have to pay more for the listings because ProCD could not obtain any contribution toward costs from the consumer market.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Frank H. Easterbrook Frank H. Easterbrook ProCD v. Zeidenberg — Opinion of the Court

Licenses may have other benefits for consumers: many licenses permit users to make extra copies, to use the software on multiple computers, even to incorporate the software into the user's products. But whether a particular license is generous or restrictive, a simple two-party contract is not "equivalent to any of the exclusive rights within the general scope of copyright" and therefore may be enforced.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature