Summary

Frank Murphy United States v. Resler — Opinion of the Court

This appeal presents two important questions affecting the administration of the Motor Carrier Act of 1935, 49 Stat. 543, 49 U.S.C.A. § 301 et seq. The first is whether § 213 (e) places beyond reach of § 212 (b) transfers of operating rights where not more than twenty vehicles are involved. The second is whether the Interstate Commerce Commission possessed statutory authority to rule that assent of the Commission is a condition precedent to an effective transfer which is subject to § 212 (b) .
Source: Wikisource

Frank Murphy United States v. Resler — Opinion of the Court

In many respects a transferee such as appellee stands in the same relation to the Commission as an original applicant for permission to operate. Many inquiries which are elevant to the initial application are equally relevant to the proposed transfer. Section 206 (a) , with immaterial exceptions, permits common carriers by motor vehicles to operate only if the carrier has first obtained a certificate of public convenience and necessity.
Source: Wikisource

Frank Murphy United States v. Resler — Opinion of the Court

Section 215 requires the Commission to withhold a certificate until the carrier has complied with Commission regulations exacting security for damage to persons and property. Section 217 compels specified carriers to file tariff schedules. Section 221 obligates motor carriers to file written designations of agents for service of process and Commission orders.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature