Summary

Portrait of Hugo Black Hugo Black United States v. Seatrain Lines…

The language of this section would seem to preclude the Commission from attaching terms and conditions to a certificate which would deprive the public of the best type of service which could be rendered between ports by a water carrier. In view of this difference between the statutory authority of the Commission to prescribe the service of water carriers and of motor carriers, our decisions relating to the Commission's power as to motor carriers in this respect [5] are not controlling as to the Commission's power to regulate the details of the service of water carriers.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Hugo Black Hugo Black United States v. Seatrain Lines…

There the Commission pointedly ruled for the first time that a certificate to carry 'commodities generally' did not authorize water carriage of loaded or unloaded freight cars-so-called 'car-ferry service.' Thus it seems apparent that the Seatrain proceedings were reopened not to correct a mere clerical error, but to execute the new policy announced in the Foss case.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Hugo Black Hugo Black United States v. Seatrain Lines…

Seatrain is and long has been a common carrier of goods by water. Its harbor facilities and vessels have been constructed to enable it to perform a distinctive type of water carriage. Loaded railroad cars can be hoisted and transported in its vessels, thereby eliminating such things as trouble, time and breakage, said to be incident to loading and unloading goods from railroad cars.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature