Summary

Portrait of Fred M. Vinson Fred M. Vinson Shelley v. Kraemer — Opinion of the Court (1948)

It is doubtless true that a State may act through different agencies, either by its legislative, its executive, or its judicial authorities, and the prohibitions of the amendment extend to all action of the State denying equal protection of the laws, whether it be action by one of these agencies or by another. In Ex parte Virginia, 100 U.S. 339, 347 (1880) , the Court observed: "A State acts by its legislative, its executive, or its judicial authorities. It can act in no other way."
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Fred M. Vinson Fred M. Vinson Shelley v. Kraemer — Opinion of the Court (1948)

In arriving at its result, this Court did not reach the issues presented by the cases now under consideration.
It is well, at the outset, to scrutinize the terms of the restrictive agreements involved in these cases. In the Missouri case, the covenant declares that no part of the [p10] affected property shall be
occupied by any person not of the Caucasian race, it being intended hereby to restrict the use of said property . . . against the occupancy as owners or tenants of any portion of said property for resident or other purpose by people of the Negro or Mongolian Race.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature