Summary

Portrait of George Shiras, Jr. George Shiras, Jr. Brass v. North Dakota ex rel. Stoeser…

We do not understand this law to require the owner of a warehouse, built and used by him only to store his own grain, to receive and store the grain of others. Such a duty only arises when he chooses to enter upon the business of elevating and storing the grain of other persons for profit. Then he becomes subject to the statutory regulations, and he cannot escape them by asserting that he also elevates and stores his own grain in the same warehouse.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of George Shiras, Jr. George Shiras, Jr. Brass v. North Dakota ex rel. Stoeser…

It can scarcely be meant to contend that the statutes of Illinois and New York, valid in their present form, would become illegal if the lawmakers thought fit to repeal the clauses limiting their operation to cities of a certain size, or that the statute of North Dakota would at once be validated if one or more of her towns were to reach a population of 100,000, and her legislature were to restrict the operation of the statute to such cities.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of George Shiras, Jr. George Shiras, Jr. Brass v. North Dakota ex rel. Stoeser…

In the thirteenth article of the constitution of the state of Illinois, adopted in 1870, all elevators or storehouses where grain or other property is stored for a compensation, whether the property stored by kept separate or not, were declared to be public warehouses, and it was made the duty of the general assembly to pass all necessary laws to give full effect to that article of the constitution.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature