Summary

Portrait of George Shiras, Jr. George Shiras, Jr. Dooley v. Pease — Opinion of the Court

It is conceded, or, if not conceded, we regard it as well established, that the policy of the law in Illinois will not permit the owner of personal property to sell it and still continue in possession of it, so as to exempt it from seizure or attachment at the suit of creditors of the vendor. If, between the parties, without delivery, the sale is valid, it has no effect on third persons who, in good faith, purchase it; and an attaching creditor stands in the light of a purchaser, and as such will be protected.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of George Shiras, Jr. George Shiras, Jr. Dooley v. Pease — Opinion of the Court

Possession is one of the strongest evidences of title to this class of property, and cannot be rightfully separated from the title, except in the manner pointed out by statute. The courts of Illinois say that to suffer, without notice to the world, the real ownership to be in one person, and the ostensible ownership in another, gives a false credit to the latter, and in this way works an injury to third persons.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of George Shiras, Jr. George Shiras, Jr. Dooley v. Pease — Opinion of the Court

Secret liens which treat the vendor of personal property, who has delivered possession of it to the purchaser as the owner until the payment of the purchase money, cannot be maintained in Illinois. They are held to be constructively fraudulent as to creditors, and the property, so far as their rights are concerned, is considered as belonging to the purchaser holding the possession.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature