Summary

Portrait of George Shiras, Jr. George Shiras, Jr. Shapleigh v. San Angelo — Opinion of the Court

What was the legal effect of the disincorporation of the city of San Angelo and of its subsequent reincorporation as respects the bonds in suit? Did the decree of the district court of Tom Green county, abolishing the city of San Angelo as incorporated in 1889, operate to render its incorporation void ab initio, and to nullify all its debts and obligations created while its validity was unchallenged?
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of George Shiras, Jr. George Shiras, Jr. Shapleigh v. San Angelo — Opinion of the Court

As things then stood, it is plain that the city could not have set up, to defeat its obligations, any supposed irregularity or illegality in its organization. The state, being the creator of municipal corporations, is the proper party to impeach the validity of their creation. If the state acquiesces in the validity of a municipal corporation, its corporate existence cannot be collaterally attacked.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of George Shiras, Jr. George Shiras, Jr. Shapleigh v. San Angelo — Opinion of the Court

An absolute repeal of a municipal charter is, therefore, effectual so far as it abolishes the old corporate organization; but when the same, or substantially the same, inhabitants are erected into a new corporation, whether with extended or restricted territorial limits, such new corporation is treated as in law the successor of the old one, entitled to its property rights, and subject to its liabilities.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature