Summary

Portrait of George Shiras, Jr. George Shiras, Jr. St. Joseph Company v. Steele — Opinion of the Court

We cannot accede to the proposition that because the acts of congress which authorized the construction of the bridge in question gave the right to build a railroad and toll bridge, the conceded power of the state to tax did not extend to the bridge in both aspects. Nor can we agree that the making of such a contention raised a federal question of a character to confer original jurisdiction in the circuit court of the United States. Not every mere allegation of the existence of a federal question in a controversy will suffice for that purpose.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of George Shiras, Jr. George Shiras, Jr. St. Joseph Company v. Steele — Opinion of the Court

While a railroad company owning and operating a line running through several states may receive and exercise powers granted by each, and may, for many purposes, be regarded as a corporation of each, such legislation does not avail to make the same corporation a citizen of every state it passes through, within the meaning of the jurisdiction clause of the constitution of the United States.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of George Shiras, Jr. George Shiras, Jr. St. Joseph Company v. Steele — Opinion of the Court

Joseph & Grand Island Railroad Company, in its petition filed in the circuit court of the United States for the district of Kansas against R. M. Steele, sheriff of Doniphan county, Kan., alleged that the controversy in the case involved the construction of an act of congress approved July 14, 1870, granting to the St. Joseph & Denver City Railroad Company the right to build a bridge and maintain the same across the Missouri river at or near St.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature