Gilbert S. Merritt

Summary

Gilbert S. Merritt,  Lexmark Int'l v. Static Control Components… (2004 | noyearcat)

“ A monopolist could enforce its will against a smaller rival simply because the potential cost of extended litigation and discovery where the burden of proof shifts to the defendant is itself a deterrent to innovation and competition. Misreading the statute to shift the burden in this way could allow powerful manufacturers in practice to create monopolies where they are not in principle supported by law. ”
Source: Wikisource

Gilbert S. Merritt,  Lexmark Int'l v. Static Control Components… (2004 | noyearcat)

“ Giving authors monopolies over manufactured goods as well as over their creative expressions will clearly not “promote the Progress of Science and the useful Arts,” but rather would stifle progress by stamping out competition from manufacturers who may be able to design better or less expensive replacement parts like toner cartridges. ”
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature