Summary

Portrait of Stanley Forman Reed Stanley Forman Reed,  Buck v. Gallagher — Opinion of the Court

“ From our standpoint we think the cost of doing business has nothing to do with the method of doing business. It is true the statute may necessitate a large expenditure but that would not mean anything because by a large expenditure you might make a much larger profit. Perhaps we don't understand each other but I think that is the basis of measuring the value of the matter in controversy.'↑ Buck v. ”
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Stanley Forman Reed Stanley Forman Reed,  Buck v. Gallagher — Opinion of the Court

“ By section 4 of the Washington statute every combination of two or more copyright owners must file, once a year, with the secretary of state, a complete list of their copyrighted works, under oath. [9] By section 3, individuals are forbidden from joining together 'for the purpose of collecting fees in this state' unless their licenses are on a per piece system of rates. In addition to the general allegation that the value of the matter in controversy exceeds $3,000, the bill alleges the cost of compliance by the Society, the combination of members, with section four would exceed $300,000. ”
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature