Summary

Portrait of Stanley Forman Reed Stanley Forman Reed Buck v. Gallagher — Opinion of the Court

From our standpoint we think the cost of doing business has nothing to do with the method of doing business. It is true the statute may necessitate a large expenditure but that would not mean anything because by a large expenditure you might make a much larger profit. Perhaps we don't understand each other but I think that is the basis of measuring the value of the matter in controversy.'↑ Buck v.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Stanley Forman Reed Stanley Forman Reed Buck v. Gallagher — Opinion of the Court

By section 4 of the Washington statute every combination of two or more copyright owners must file, once a year, with the secretary of state, a complete list of their copyrighted works, under oath. [9] By section 3, individuals are forbidden from joining together 'for the purpose of collecting fees in this state' unless their licenses are on a per piece system of rates. In addition to the general allegation that the value of the matter in controversy exceeds $3,000, the bill alleges the cost of compliance by the Society, the combination of members, with section four would exceed $300,000.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature