Stanley Forman Reed

Biographical details

Portrait of Stanley Forman Reed Stanley Forman Reed,  Pennekamp v. Florida — Opinion of the Court

“ The right to undermine proceedings in court is not a special prerogative of the press.
The press does have the right, which is its professional function, to criticize and to advocate. The whole gamut of public affairs is the domain for fearless and critical comment, and not least the administration of justice. But the public function which belongs to the press makes it an obligation of honor to exercise this function only with the fullest sense of responsibility. Without such a lively sense of responsibility a free press may readily become a powerful instrument of injustice.
”
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Stanley Forman Reed Stanley Forman Reed,  Jones v. City of Opelika (316 U.S. 584…

“ Courts, no more than Constitutions, can intrude into the consciences of men or compel them to believe contrary to their faith or think contrary to their convictions, but courts are competent to adjudge the acts men do under color of a constitutional right, such as that of freedom of speech or of the press or the free exercise of religion and to determine whether the claimed right is limited by other recognized powers, equally precious to mankind. ”
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Stanley Forman Reed Stanley Forman Reed,  Gibbs v. Buck — Opinion of the Court (1939)

“ If the States have somehow lost their historic power to prohibit monopolistic price fixing combinations before presentation of evidence to a Federal court, at what point in our history and in what manner did they lose it? The people have not exercised their exclusive authority, by Constitutional amendment, to strip the States of their power over price fixing combinations and thus raise monopoly above the traditional power of legislative bodies. ”
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature