Summary

Portrait of Stanley Forman Reed Stanley Forman Reed Tee-Hit-Ton Indians v. United States…

This is true, not because an Indian or an Indian tribe has no standing to sue or because the United States has not consented to be sued for the taking of original Indian title, but because Indian occupation of land without government recognition of ownership creates no rights against taking or extinction by the United States protected by the Fifth Amendment or any other principle of law.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Stanley Forman Reed Stanley Forman Reed Tee-Hit-Ton Indians v. United States…

No case in this Court has ever held that taking of Indian title or use by Congress required compensation. The American people have compassion for the descendants of those Indians who were deprived of their homes and hunting grounds by the drive of civilization. They seek to have the Indians share the benefits of our society as citizens of this Nation. Generous provision has been willingly made to allow tribes to recover for wrongs, as a matter of grace, not because of legal liability.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature