Summary

Portrait of William O. Douglas William O. Douglas United States v. Santa Fe Pacific Railroad Company…

Occupancy necessary to establish aboriginal possession is a question of fact to be determined as any other question of fact. If it were established as a fact that the lands in question were, or were included in, the ancestral home of the Walapais in the sense that they constituted definable territory occupied exclusively by the Walapais (as distinguished from lands wandered over by many tribes) , then the Walapais had 'Indian title' which unless extinguished survived the railroad grant of 1866.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of William O. Douglas William O. Douglas United States v. Santa Fe Pacific Railroad Company…

That would make the creation of the 1883 reservation, as an attempted solution of the violent problems created when two civilizations met in this area, illusory indeed. We must give it the definitiveness which the exigencies of that situation seem to demand. Hence, acquiescence in that arrangement must be deemed to have been a relinquishment of tribal rights in lands outside the reservation and notoriously claimed by others.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of William O. Douglas William O. Douglas United States v. Santa Fe Pacific Railroad Company…

But we do not agree that, so far as the respondent's rights are concerned, that Act instituted a policy of non-recognition of Indian title. Nor do we think that it effected any extinguishment of that title.
The Act of 1854 established the office of Surveyor General of New Mexico. It donated land to certain qualified citizens (§ 2) with the exception, inter alia, of 'military or other reservations'.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature