Summary

Portrait of Hugo Black Hugo Black Creek Nation v. United States Seminole Nation…

As a nation we have incurred moral and political responsibilities toward them and their descendants which have been requited in some measure by treaties and statutes framed for the protection and advancement of their interests. Those enactments should always be read in the light of this high and noble purpose, in a manner that will give full scope and effect to the humane and liberal policy that has been adopted by the Congress to rectify past wrongs.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Hugo Black Hugo Black Creek Nation v. United States Seminole Nation…

To read the Act of 1902 otherwise is to take too restricted a view of the obligations of the United States toward a dependent people. But if there were any doubt, the duty of the Secretary of the Interior to collect the mileage charges was made plain and unmistakable by the Act of 1906 which required him to collect all revenues accruing to the tribes and specifically authorized him to bring suit on their behalf. The present claim to mileage charges undoubtedly is an equitable one arising out of those statutes and is therefore within the scope and purpose of the jurisdictional acts.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Hugo Black Hugo Black Creek Nation v. United States Seminole Nation…

We conclude that, whether or not the guarantee is limited to military protection, this language did not obligate the United States to compensate the tribes for encroachments by railroads acting under color of right. Keeping the peace and protecting the Indians was a difficult, and at times almost impossible, task, [6] and we cannot assume that the government meant to guarantee reparations for breach of quiet possession without a single explicit word in the Treaty to that effect.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature