Summary

Portrait of Stanley Forman Reed Stanley Forman Reed Madden v. Kentucky — Opinion of the Court

An interpretation of the privileges and immunities clause which restricts the power of the states to manage their own fiscal affairs is a matter of gravest concern to them. [23] It is only the emphatic requirements of the Constitution which properly may lead the federal courts to such a conclusion.
Appellant relies upon Colgate v. Harvey, supra, [24] as a precedent to support his argument that the present statute is not within the limits of permissible classification and violates the privileges and immunities clause.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Stanley Forman Reed Stanley Forman Reed Madden v. Kentucky — Opinion of the Court

The executor used as one defense against this claim the contention that a tax on deposits in banks outside of Kentucky at a higher rate than the tax upon bank deposits within Kentucky would abridge decedent's privileges and immunities as a citizen of the United States, deprive him of his property right and the liberty to keep money on deposit outside of Kentucky without due process of law, and deny to him equal protection of the law in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature