Stanley Forman Reed,
Madden v. Kentucky — Opinion of the Court
“ An interpretation of the privileges and immunities clause which restricts the power of the states to manage their own fiscal affairs is a matter of gravest concern to them. [23] It is only the emphatic requirements of the Constitution which properly may lead the federal courts to such a conclusion.Appellant relies upon Colgate v. Harvey, supra, [24] as a precedent to support his argument that the present statute is not within the limits of permissible classification and violates the privileges and immunities clause. ”
