Summary

Portrait of Stanley Forman Reed Stanley Forman Reed Hood Sons v. United States — Opinion of the Court

Producers and handlers are defined, the first as any person producing milk in conformity with the health regulations applicable to milk sold for consumption as milk in the marketing area, the second as all, including producers or associations of producers, who engage 'in such handling of milk, which is sold as milk or cream in the Marketing Area, as is in the current of interstate commerce or which directly burdens, obstructs or affects interstate or foreign commerce in milk and its products.'
There are two use classifications, roughly, fluid and non-fluid.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Stanley Forman Reed Stanley Forman Reed Hood Sons v. United States — Opinion of the Court

The first thing the Secretary is permitted to accomplish by regulation, so the statute declares, is the parity in purchasing power of the price to be received by producers with that received in the base period. This parity is to be in terms of things farmers purchase. A moment's reflection will show that any calculation of such parity is impossible. The things farmers purchase, the relative quantities in which they purchase them, and their price in terms of milk, vary from month to month and from year to year.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Stanley Forman Reed Stanley Forman Reed Hood Sons v. United States — Opinion of the Court

As the action of handlers forms the ground for the initiation of regulation under the Act [17] and for classification, reports, calculation and payment under the Order, [18] we conclude that the milk received by handlers for use in the area is the proper basis of computation. True, the reports are based on the delivery of milk by defined producers but in view of the terms of the Order as a whole, we are of the opinion the milk from unregistered farms must also be reported. The Act and Order regulate marketing.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature