Summary

Portrait of James Clark McReynolds James Clark McReynolds Nebbia v. New York — Dissenting Opinion

And if it be now ruled that one dedicates his property to public use whenever he embarks on an enterprise which the Legislature may think it desirable to bring under control, this is but to declare that rights guaranteed by the Constitution exist only so long as supposed public interest does not require their extinction. To adopt such a view, of course, would put an end to liberty under the Constitution.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of James Clark McReynolds James Clark McReynolds Nebbia v. New York — Dissenting Opinion

The somewhat misty suggestion below, that condemnation of the challenged legislation would amount to holding "that the due process clause has left milk producers unprotected from oppression," I assume, was not intended as a material contribution to the discussion upon the merits of the cause. Grave concern for embarrassed farmers is everywhere, but this should neither obscure the rights of others nor obstruct judicial appraisement of measures proposed for relief. The ultimate welfare of the producer, like that of every other class, requires dominance of the Constitution.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature