Summary

Portrait of Stanley Forman Reed Stanley Forman Reed Colgate-Palmolive-Peet Company v…

The advantage would be slight if Congress had supposed the tax would finally be borne by the consumer rather than by the manufacturer, but here the purpose was to restrict the domestic market for imported oils, and Congress probably would not intend that manufacturers should find a market for the foreign oil at a price enhanced by the full amount of the tax. Again, if petitioner's argument is sound, the Congressional purpose to create an advantage for domestic oil producers would be frustrated to the extent that tax free foreign oils on hand could continue to compete with the domestic produce.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Stanley Forman Reed Stanley Forman Reed Colgate-Palmolive-Peet Company v…

The Senate amended the section of the House bill which taxed foreign oils by the addition of other foreign vegetable oils and marine oils. The Conference accepted the amendment in regard to the marine oils but changed 'the point of imposition of the tax in the case of imported whale oil, imported fish oil and imported marine animal oil to the importation instead of the first domestic processing.' These were all the marine oils in the Senate amendment.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature