Summary

Portrait of Stanley Forman Reed Stanley Forman Reed United States v. Shaw — Opinion of the Court

The principle of a single adjudication is stressed, as is the necessity for a complete examination into the cross-claim, despite attendant dislocation of government business by the appearance of important officers at distant points and the production of documents as evidence, to justify the allowance of an offset to the government's claim.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Stanley Forman Reed Stanley Forman Reed United States v. Shaw — Opinion of the Court

Whether that jurisdiction exists depends upon the effect of the voluntary submission to the Michigan court by the United States of its claim against the estate. As a foundation for the examination of that question we may lay the postulate that without specific statutory consent, no suit may be brought against the United States. [18] No officer by his action can confer jurisdiction. [19] Even when suits are authorized they must be brought only in designated courts. [20] The reasons for this immunity are imbedded in our legal philosophy.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature