Summary

Portrait of H. L. Mencken H. L. Mencken The American Language — The Treatment of Loan-Words (1919)

He goes on: “After we have decided that the foreign word we find knocking at the doors of English [he really means American, as the context shows] is likely to be useful, we must fit it for naturalization by insisting that it shall shed its accents, if it has any; that it shall change its spelling, if this is necessary; that it shall modify its pronunciation, if this is not easy for us to compass; and that it shall conform to all our speech-habits, especially in the formation of the plural.” This counsel is heeded by the great majority of American printers.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of H. L. Mencken H. L. Mencken The American Language — The Treatment of Loan-Words (1919)

The Society hopes to discredit this tendency, and it will endeavour to restore to English its old recreative energy; when a choice is possible we should wish to give an English pronunciation and spelling to useful foreign words, and we would attempt to restore to a good many words the old English forms which they once had, but which are now supplanted by the original foreign forms.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of H. L. Mencken H. L. Mencken The American Language — The Treatment of Loan-Words (1919)

In all cases, of course, the accents are omitted. In the formation of the plural American adopts native forms much more quickly than English. All the English authorities that I have consulted advocate retaining the foreign plurals of most of the loan-words in daily use, e. g., sanatoria, appendices, indices, virtuosi, formulœ, libretti, media, thèsdansants, monsignori. But American usage favors plurals of native design, and sometimes they take quite fantastic forms.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature