Summary

Portrait of Harlan F. Stone Harlan F. Stone Shaw v. Gibson-Zahniser Oil Corporation…

To hold them immune would be inconsistent with one of the very purposes of their creation, to educate the indians in responsibility, and would present the curious paradox that the Secretary by a mere conveyancer's restriction, permitted by Congress, had rendered the land free from taxation and thus actually relieved the Indians of all responsibility. There are some instrumentalities which, though Congress may protect them from state taxation, will nevertheless be subject to that taxation unless Congress speaks.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Harlan F. Stone Harlan F. Stone Shaw v. Gibson-Zahniser Oil Corporation…

It cannot be assumed that Congress at a time when it was withdrawing allotted lands from their former exemption in order that Indian citizens might assume the just burdens of state taxation, intended to extend a tax exemption by implication. In any case the Secretary of the Interior has never, by rule or regulation or other action, purported to exempt such lands from state taxation.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature