Summary

Portrait of Harlan F. Stone Harlan F. Stone Silver v. Silver — Opinion of the Court

In this day of almost universal highway transportation by motorcar, we cannot say that abuses originating in the multiplicity of suits growing out of the gratuitous carriage of passengers in automobiles do not present so conspicuous an example of what the Legislature may regard as an evil, as to justify legislation aimed at it, even though some abuses may not be hit.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Harlan F. Stone Harlan F. Stone Silver v. Silver — Opinion of the Court

Granted that the liability to be imposed upon those who operate any kind of vehicle for the benefit of a mere guest or licensee is an appropriate subject of legislative restruction, there is no constitutional requirement that a regulation, in other respects permissible, must reach every class to which it might be applied-that the Legislature must be held rigidly to the choice of regulating all or none.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Harlan F. Stone Harlan F. Stone Silver v. Silver — Opinion of the Court

No person transported by the owner or operator of a motor vehicle as his guest without payment for such transportation shall have a cause of action for damages against such owner or operator for injury, death or loss, in case of accident, unless such accident shall have been intentional on the part of said owner or operator or caused by his heedlessness or his reckless disregard of the rights of others.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature