Harry Blackmun

Harry Blackmun

Summary

Portrait of Harry Blackmun Harry Blackmun Cohen v. California — Dissent (1971)

Justice Murphy, a known champion of First Amendment freedoms, wrote for a unanimous bench. As a consequence, this Court's agonizing over First Amendment values seem misplaced and unnecessary.
2. I am not at all certain that the California Court of Appeal's construction of § 415 is now the authoritative California construction. The Court of Appeal filed its opinion on October 22, 1969. The Supreme Court of California declined review by a four-to-three vote on December 17. See 1 Cal.App.3d, at 104, 81 Cal.Rptr., at 503.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Harry Blackmun Harry Blackmun Cohen v. California — Dissent (1971)

In re Bushman, 1 Cal.3d 767, 83 Cal.Rptr. 375, 463 P.2d 727. Chief Justice Traynor, who was among the dissenters to his court's refusal to take Cohen's case, wrote the majority opinion. He held that § 415 'is not unconstitutionally vague and overbroad' and further said:
' (T) hat part of Penal Code section 415 in question here makes punishable only wilful and malicious conduct that is violent and endangers public safety and order or that creates a clear and present danger that others will engage in violence of that nature.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature