Summary

Portrait of Henry Billings Brown Henry Billings Brown Schell v. Fauch E — Opinion of the Court

It is an acknowledged principle of law that if rights have been acquired under a judicial interpretation of a statute which has been acquiesced in by the public, such rights ought not to be impaired or disturbed by a different construction, and if, notwithstanding treasury regulation No. 384, requiring protests to be special in each case, a practice has grown up in the different ports of entry of receiving prospective protests, the annualment of such practice might entail serious consequences upon importers who had acted upon the faith of its validity.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Henry Billings Brown Henry Billings Brown Schell v. Fauch E — Opinion of the Court

The officers of the government on the one part, and the importer or his agent on the other, are brought into communication and intercourse by the act of entry of theimport, and opportunities for explanation easily occur for every difference that may arise. We are not, therefore, disposed to exact any nice precision, nor to apply nay strict rule of construction upon the notices required under this statute.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature