Summary

Portrait of Henry Billings Brown Henry Billings Brown United States v. Tanner — Opinion of the Court

The delivery of a warrant of commitment to a warden of a penitentiary is in no sense a service of a process, warrant, attachment, or other writ, within the meaning of the clause first above cited. The word 'process,' as used in that clause, evidently refers to process for bringing persons or property within the jurisdiction of the court, and not to warrants of commitment, by virtue of which criminals are transported from the court to the place of commitment.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Henry Billings Brown Henry Billings Brown United States v. Tanner — Opinion of the Court

Not only does the transportation of a prisoner imply a travel in company with him, but section 829 expressly allows a fee of fifty cents for 'every commitment * * * of a prisoner,' which implies the deposit of a warrant of commitment with the jailer. In some jurisdictions the prisoner is committed and held under a certified copy of the sentence, and no commitment at all is used.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature