Summary

Portrait of Henry Billings Brown Henry Billings Brown Walter Wood Mowing Reaping Mach Company v…

But the referee found that, by accepting the license and agreeding to use the plaintiff's patented device, the defendant was estopped to deny the validity of the partent to the full extent of its claim, and if, as he found, the defendant made use of the device set forth in the claim of the patent, or its mechanical equivalent, it was liable, though in an action for infringement of such claim it might have been adjudged invalid.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Henry Billings Brown Henry Billings Brown Walter Wood Mowing Reaping Mach Company v…

It is well settled by a long series of adjudications that, to give this court jurisdiction by writ of error to a state court, it must appear affirmatively, not only that a federal question was presented for decision to the highest court of the state having jurisdiction, but that its decision was necessary to the determination of the case, and that it was actually decided, or that the judgment as rendered could not have been given without deciding it.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature