Summary

Portrait of Herbert Choy Herbert Choy Kouba v. Allstate Insurance Co…

At one extreme are two that would tolerate all but the most blatant discrimination. Kouba asserts that Allstate wrongly reads "factor other than sex" to mean any factor that either does not refer on its face to an employee's gender or does not result in all women having lower salaries than all men. Since an employer could easily manipulate factors having a close correlation to gender as a guise to pay female employees discriminatorily low salaries, it would contravene the Act to allow their use simply because they also are facially neutral or do not produce complete segregation.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Herbert Choy Herbert Choy Kouba v. Allstate Insurance Co…

Our study of the legislative history of the Equal Pay Act confirms that Congress discussed only factors that reflect job value.
In drafting the Act, however, Congress did not limit the exception to job-evaluation systems. Instead, it excepted "any other factor other than sex " and thus created a "broad general exception." H. R. Rep. 309, 88th Cong., 1st Sess. 3, reprinted in 1963 U.S.C.ode Cong. & Ad. News 687, 689. While a concern about job-evaluation systems served as the impetus for creating the exception, Congress did not limit the exception to that concern.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature