Herman Cyril McNeile

Herman Cyril McNeile

Summary

Portrait of Herman Cyril McNeile Herman Cyril McNeile Bulton's Revenge (1923)

Jack Simpson and Scott were talking, it's true, about a native they'd hanged in the back of beyond for a triple murder—but it was Bulton who introduced the wide subject of capital punishment generally. Was it sound, was it a good thing? Above all, did it succeed in its object?
The usual arguments were advanced for and against. It was Scott who was all for its retention, and who argued that the whole idea of punishment was that it should act as a deterrent to others, and not be regarded entirely as a punishment to the culprit. But was death more of a deterrent than, say, imprisonment for life?
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Herman Cyril McNeile Herman Cyril McNeile Bulton's Revenge (1923)

Then the fair-haired man ranged himself on Scott's side in no halting language.
“Rank sentimentality,” he remarked. “There are crimes of violence and assault which I would punish by torture rather than by mere hanging. Brutal, unprovoked murders—and attempts at murder, for which no mercy should be shown in this world, or the next. Why, I know a case——” He broke off suddenly.
“Go on,” said Bulton quietly, and he was staring at the fair-haired man.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Herman Cyril McNeile Herman Cyril McNeile Bulton's Revenge (1923)

Scott snorted—but Scott was a policeman. And it was Murgatroyd who drew attention to the mental side of the punishment.
“Surely the actual physical act of killing a man by hanging him is the least important side of the question. The awful thing to my mind would be the three weeks of waiting. Knowing that every time the sun rose, death came one day nearer. The mental side of the punishment is the worse by far. And that can be no deterrent to others, because no one can realize what it means until they are in that position themselves.”
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature