Horace Gray

“ It would be an extraordinary result, if the courts of the United States, in exercising the jurisdiction conferred upon them with a view to secure the rights of citizens residing in different states, should hold such a conveyance to be valid against citizens of other states as the supreme court of ohio holds to be void as against its own citizens. ”

“ Bank, 46 Ohio St. 493, 22 N. E. Rep. 293, that court, upon a similar state of facts, adjudged that mortgages made by a trading corporation after it had become insolvent, and had ceased to do business, to prefer some of its creditors, were invalid and ineffectual against its creditors generally, without regard to the question whether the mortgages were or were not parts of the same transaction as an assignment under the statute. ”

“ Graham v. Railroad Co., 102 U.S. 148, 161; Railway Co. V. Ham, 114 U.S. 587, 594, 5 Sup. Ct. Rep. 1081; Richardson v. Green, 133 U.S. 30, 44, ante, 280; Fogg v. Blair, 133 U.S. 534, 541, ante, 338; Peters v. ”