Summary

Portrait of Horace Harmon Lurton Horace Harmon Lurton Jordan v. Massachusetts — Opinion of the Court

Due process implies a tribunal both impartial and mentally competent to afford a hearing. But to say that due process is denied when a competent state court refuses to set aside the verdict of a jury because the sanity of one of its members was established by only a preponderance of evidence would be to enforce an exaction unknown to the precedents of the past, and an interference with the discretion and power of the state not justified by the demands of justice, nor recognized by any definition of due process.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Horace Harmon Lurton Horace Harmon Lurton Jordan v. Massachusetts — Opinion of the Court

In criminal cases due process of law is not denied by a state law which dispenses with a grand jury indictment and permits prosecution upon information, nor by a law which dispenses with the necessity of a jury of twelve, or unanimity in the verdict. Indeed, the requirement of due process does not deprive a state of the power to dispense with jury trial altogether.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature