Summary

Portrait of Howell Edmunds Jackson Howell Edmunds Jackson Loeber v. Schroeder — Opinion of the Court

It is well settled that a writ of error will not lie except to review a final judgment or decree of the highest court of the state, and that it will not lie to an order overruling a motion to quash an execution, because a decision upon the rule or motion is not such a final judgment or decree in any suit as is contemplated by the judiciary acts of the general government. Refusal to quash a writ is not a final judgment.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Howell Edmunds Jackson Howell Edmunds Jackson Loeber v. Schroeder — Opinion of the Court

From the judgment of the court of appeals affirming the order of the lower court, Loeber has prosecuted the present writ of error, and assigned, substantially, as the grounds thereof, that section 33 of article 5 of the Code of Public General Laws of the State of Maryland is repugnant to the fourteenth amendment of the constitution of the United States, which declares that no state shall deprive any person of his property without due process of law
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature