Summary

Portrait of Hugo Black Hugo Black Helvering v. Oregon Mutual Life Insurance Company…

And, pursuant to the conceived analogy of reserves to capital investment, net income was to be determined by permitting, among other deductions from gross income, that same deduction here in dispute-a percentage of the 'reserve funds required by law.'
As entirely new and separate tax provisions relating only to life insurance companies were thus enacted, it became necessary specifically to define what constituted a 'life insurance company' within the meaning of the Act.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Hugo Black Hugo Black Helvering v. Oregon Mutual Life Insurance Company…

The liability to those who have incurred disability is not a fixed sum, but remains a contingency, still uncertain in duration and amount. Reserves held for such a contingent liability are true reserves in the insurance sense.
We find it unnecessary to discuss the extent to which such a regulation might, under different circumstances, be given retroactive effect by virtue of the statutory power of the Commissioner. [18] Nor do we find it necessary to discuss the argument that the policy behind the special treatment afforded life insurance companies does not warrant allowing this deduction.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature