Summary

Portrait of Hugo Black Hugo Black United States v. Wurts — Opinion of the Court

It would require language so clear as to leave room for no other reasonable construction in order to induce the belief that Congress intended a statute of limitations to begin to run before the right barred by it has accrued. Obviously, the Government had no right to sue this taxpayer to recover money before money had been paid to him. The construction urged by respondent would allowed the statute of limitations to begin to run against recovery on an erroneous payment before any such payment is made.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Hugo Black Hugo Black United States v. Wurts — Opinion of the Court

Ordinarily, recovery of Government funds, paid by mistake to one having no just right to keep the funds, is not barred by the passage of time. [4] There is no contention here that respondent has any right to retain this refund erroneously paid by the Government. His defense is that the statutory bar prevents recovery. The Government's right to recover funds, from a person who received them by mistake and without right, is not barred unless Congress has 'clearly manifested its intention' [5] to raise a statutory barrier.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature