Summary

Portrait of James Clark McReynolds James Clark McReynolds Fairbanks v. United States (306 U.S. 436…

Both courts below ruled that gain derived by the petitioner from redemption of bonds during 1927, 1928 and 1929 was not 'capital gain' within the meaning of the controlling statutes.
No contest exists concerning the facts. The narrow point as counsel agree is this-Must the redemption of bonds before maturity by the issuing corporation be treated as tantamount to a sale or exchange of capital assets within the meaning of section 208 (a) (1) , Revenue Act 1926, and section 101 (c) (1) , Revenue Act 1928.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature