Summary

Portrait of James Clark McReynolds James Clark McReynolds Kansas City Terminal Railway Company v…

As above stated, to the extent of their debts creditors are entitled to priority over stockholders against all the property of an insolvent corporation. But it does not follow that in every reorganization the securities offered to general creditors must be superior in rank or grade to any which stockholders may obtain. It is not impossible to accord to the creditor his superior rights in other ways.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of James Clark McReynolds James Clark McReynolds Kansas City Terminal Railway Company v…

Practically, it is impossible to sell the property of a great railroad for cash and, generally, the interests of all parties, including the public, are best served by co-operation between bondholders and stockholders. If creditors decline a fair offer based upon the principles above stated, they are left to protect themselves. After such refusal they cannot attack the reorganization in a court of equity.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature