Summary

Portrait of Harlan F. Stone Harlan F. Stone Blakey v. Brinson — Opinion of the Court

But the mere debiting of his account, without more, for the reimbursement of the bank for the obligation which it was supposed to have incurred or paid, lends no support to such an inference. The cancellation of the credit balance by the debit neither suggests any intention to establish a trust nor points to any identifiable thing which could be the subject of it.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Harlan F. Stone Harlan F. Stone Blakey v. Brinson — Opinion of the Court

As we conclude that petitioner's first position is well taken, it is unnecessary to consider the second. It would have been equally competent for respondent to have provided for the purchase of the bonds either by the creation of a trust of funds in the hands of the bank, to be used for that purpose, or by establishing with it a credit to be debited with the cost of the bonds when purchased.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature