Summary

Portrait of James Clark McReynolds James Clark McReynolds,  Philadelphia Reading Railway Company v…

“ We must assume the Jersey City rate of $1.35 is intrinsically reasonable and nondiscriminatory in relation to those accorded other consuming points; and, plainly, if this were put in by all carriers, the Commission's order would be complied with and the supposed discrimination disappear. It must be taken as true that no rate above what all might lawfully establish is being demanded by any carrier ”
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of James Clark McReynolds James Clark McReynolds,  Philadelphia Reading Railway Company v…

“ Such rates are made by agreement between the participating carriers and cannot not be filed or published without such agreement. . . .'
'The appellant has no individual rate which covers the cement traffic from Evansville to Jersey City; the traffic moves on a joint rate. The cement traffic from other mills to Jersey City and to other principal consuming points also moves on joint rates. The Philadelphia & Reading is a party to many of these rates. It is also a party to the joint rate from Evansville to Jersey City.
”
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature