Summary

Portrait of James Clark McReynolds James Clark McReynolds Sunday Lake Iron Company v. Wakefield Tp…

The record discloses facts which render it more than probable that plaintiff in error's mines were assessed for the year 1911 (but not before or afterwards) relatively higher than other lands within the county although the statute enjoined the same rule for all. But we are unable to conclude that the evidence suffices clearly to establish that the state board entertained or is chargeable with any purpose or design to discriminate. Its action is not incompatible with an honest effort in new and difficult circumstances to adopt valuations not relatively unjust or unequal.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of James Clark McReynolds James Clark McReynolds Sunday Lake Iron Company v. Wakefield Tp…

When plaintiff in error first challenged the values placed upon the property of others no adequate time remained for detailed consideration nor was there sufficient evicence before the board to justify immediate and general revaluations. The very next year a diligent and, so far as appears, successful effort was made to rectify any inequality.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature