Summary

Portrait of James Moore Wayne James Moore Wayne Goodall v. Tucker — Opinion of the Court

That co-executors, unlike co-administrators, are privies in estate, because they derive the same privities over the same estate from the same will; and that under the will of Robinson, which was read, and the proofs of the qualification which were offered in this case, the plaintiff is entitled to recover against the defendant the amount of the judgment obtained by him against the only acting executors of the domicial of the decedent.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of James Moore Wayne James Moore Wayne Goodall v. Tucker — Opinion of the Court

There is a good deal of documentary evidence in the record, which we shall not notice, as it does not in any way affect the decision which should have been given upon the prayers of the plaintiff. See preceding case of Hill v. Tucker.
Those prayers were, with the defendant prayers, as follows:
'After the evidence was offered the plaintiff asked the court to decide, as if instructing a jury upon the evidence:
1st. That if the testator Robinson by his will left four executors, that Joseph Allen and W. R. Johnson, citizens of Virginia, were two of those executors
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature