Jesse E. Eschbach

Summary

Jesse E. Eschbach In re Image Worldwide — Opinion of the Court (1998 | noyearcat)

Often, these guarantees are legitimate business transactions, and not made to frustrate creditors. In recognition of this economic reality, courts have loosened the old rule that transfers primarily for the benefit of a third party invariably give no consideration to the transferor. Thus, even when there has been no direct economic benefit to a guarantor, courts performing a fraudulent transfer analysis have been increasingly willing to look at whether a guarantor received indirect benefits from the guarantee if there has been an indirect benefit.
Source: Wikisource

Jesse E. Eschbach In re Image Worldwide — Opinion of the Court (1998 | noyearcat)

The bankruptcy court held that a guarantor must receive direct economic benefits in exchange for its guarantee in order to have received reasonably equivalent value for its guarantee. While the bankruptcy court applied an overly narrow interpretation of what may constitute reasonably equivalent value for a guarantee, the bankruptcy court did not clearly err in finding that Image Worldwide did not receive reasonably equivalent value for its guarantees.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature