Summary

Portrait of William R. Day William R. Day Stellwagen v. Clum — Opinion of the Court

The federal system of bankruptcy is designed not only to distribute the property of the debtor, not by law exempted, fairly and equally among his creditors, but as a main purpose of the act, intends to aid the unfortunate debtor by giving him a fresh start in life, free from debts, except of a certain character, after the property which he owned at the time of bankruptcy has been administered for the benefit of creditors.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of William R. Day William R. Day Stellwagen v. Clum — Opinion of the Court

There is nothing in the act resembling an insolvent law. It does not discharge the insolvent from arrest or imprisonment; it leaves his after-acquired property liable to his creditors precisely as though no assignment had been made. The provisions for enforcing a trust are substantially such as a court of chancery would apply in the absence of any statutory provision. The assignment in this case must, therefore, be regarded as though the statute of Ohio, to which reference is made, had no existence.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of William R. Day William R. Day Stellwagen v. Clum — Opinion of the Court

This state statute is not opposed to the policy of the bankruptcy law or in contravention of the rules and principles established by it with a view to the fair distribution of the assets of the insolvent. It is only state laws which conflict with the bankruptcy laws of Congress that are suspended; those which are in aid of the Bankruptcy Act can stand.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature