Summary

Portrait of John Catron John Catron Harkness v. Underhill — Opinion of the Court

We concur with the Commissioner's directions, and the finding of the register and receiver, that the proceeding of Waters was a fraudulent contrivance to secure the valuable privilege of a preference of entry. It was an attempt to speculate on his part, and also on the part of Stillman, his co-partner, by fraud and falsehood. They both knew equally well that Waters was no actual settler on the public lands at any time, and that the affidavits of Waters and Trail were false.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature