John Catron,
Saltmarsh v. Tuthill (54 U.S. 229…
“ The proof was offered, and only material to establish the defence of usury, this being the sole defence. It must be admitted, that if the party to the bill had been introduced to establish the whole defence, then he was incompetent; and to hold, that he could prove a defence in part, without which piece of evidence no successful defence could be made, would be a mere evasion of the rule, which excludes such witness from giving evidence to impeach the consideration.No other question is presented to us, nor does any other exist in the record, worthy of notice. ”
