Summary

Portrait of John Hessin Clarke John Hessin Clarke Breiholz v. Board of Supervisors of Pocahontas County…

It is not necessary that we should consider whether a case can be imagined in which the ditches of a district might be enlarged, deepened, widened and lengthened to an extent such as to constitute a new construction and a new taking of property, which would require a further notice and hearing before a new assessment for it could be constitutionally imposed, for we have no such case here.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of John Hessin Clarke John Hessin Clarke Breiholz v. Board of Supervisors of Pocahontas County…

Two years later, in 1911, parts of the ditches having become so filled up as to impair the usefulness of the system, the county board of supervisors adopted a resolution declaring that it was expedient that the drainage IMPROVEMENT SHOULD BE 'REOPENED, CLEANEd and otherwise repaired' for the better service of the land tributary to it, and to that end a contract was let to 'deepen, clean, reopen and repair' the ditches in the parts and in a manner specified.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of John Hessin Clarke John Hessin Clarke Breiholz v. Board of Supervisors of Pocahontas County…

Elaborate provision is made for notice to all owners of land within a proposed drainage district, of the application for the establishment of it, of the time for hearing claims for damages likely to be caused by the construction of the drainage system, and of the time when objections may be made to the assessment in proportion to benefits.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature