Summary

Portrait of John Marshall Harlan II John Marshall Harlan II Davis v. Virginian Railway Company…

So long as jury verdicts remain subject to some degree of judicial supervision, cf. Harris v. Pennsylvania R. Co., 361 U.S. 15, 27-28, 80 S.Ct. 22, 29-30, 4 L.Ed.2d 1 (dissenting opinion) , whether or not the evidence is sufficient to warrant removing a particular case from consideration of the jury is a question which will doubtless continue to divide equally conscientious judges in all except the clearest instances.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature