Summary

Portrait of John Marshall Harlan II John Marshall Harlan II,  Davis v. Virginian Railway Company…

“ So long as jury verdicts remain subject to some degree of judicial supervision, cf. Harris v. Pennsylvania R. Co., 361 U.S. 15, 27-28, 80 S.Ct. 22, 29-30, 4 L.Ed.2d 1 (dissenting opinion) , whether or not the evidence is sufficient to warrant removing a particular case from consideration of the jury is a question which will doubtless continue to divide equally conscientious judges in all except the clearest instances. ”
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature