John Marshall Harlan II

John Marshall Harlan II

Summary

Portrait of John Marshall Harlan II John Marshall Harlan II National Labor Relations Board v…

In what other way would the administrative agency compel obedience to its invalid rule?
One cannot always have the best of both worlds. Either the rule-making provisions are to be enforced or they are not. Before the Board may be permitted to adopt a rule that so significantly alters pre-existing labor-management understandings, it must be required to conduct a satisfactory rule-making proceeding, so that it will have the benefit of wide-ranging argument before it enacts its proposed solution to an important problem.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of John Marshall Harlan II John Marshall Harlan II National Labor Relations Board v…

Since the Labor Board's Excelsior rule was to be effective only 30 days after its promulgation, it clearly falls within the rule-making requirements of the Act. [1]
Nor can I agree that the natural interpretation of the statute should be rejected because it requires the agency to choose between giving its rules immediate effect or initiating a separate rule-making proceeding. An agency chooses to apply a rule prospectively only because it represents such a departure from preexisting understandings that it would be unfair to impose the rule upon the parties in pending matters.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature