John Marshall Harlan II,
Pickelsimer v. Wainwright — Dissent
“ It is abundantly clear that each of the state grounds suggested is either plainly unavailing or so tenuous that it would be disrespectful of the Florida Supreme Court to regard it as the basis of that cout's judgment. ”
John Marshall Harlan II,
Pickelsimer v. Wainwright — Dissent
“ Cf. Klinger v. Missouri, 13 Wall. 257, 20 L.Ed. 635; Adams v. Russell, 229 U.S. 353, 358-359, 33 S.Ct. 846, 847-848, 57 L.Ed. 1224; Williams v. Kaiser, 323 U.S. 471, 478-479, 65 S.Ct. 363, 367-368, 89 L.Ed. 398. ”
