Summary

Portrait of John Marshall Harlan II John Marshall Harlan II Sanks v. Georgia — Opinion of the Court

In brief, the Georgia Supreme Court upheld, over due process and equal protection challenges, a state statutory scheme that compelled appellants, both indigent persons who sought to contest landlord petitions for summary eviction from their homes, to post, as a condition precedent to offering any defense to summary eviction, a surety bond in double the potential amount of rent due at the end of trial.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of John Marshall Harlan II John Marshall Harlan II Sanks v. Georgia — Opinion of the Court

With appellants' voluntary removal from the premises this aspect of the case is clearly moot. We have been apprised of no basis in the statutes or case law for assuming that were this Court now to hold Mrs. Sanks and Mrs. Momman were constitutionally entitled to proceed in the trial court without first posting a double-rent bond, they could then seek a decree under the statutes here at issue returning them to possession of the premises. The repealed statute spoke only of enabling a tenant already in possession to contest forcible eviction upon posting a bond.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature